Wednesday, May 28, 2014

ASEAN AS HOW IT AFFECTS YOUR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY (IP)


ASEAN AS HOW IT AFFECTS YOUR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY (IP)

“Intellectual property, more than ever, is a line drawn around information, which asserts that despite having been set loose in the world - and having, inevitably, been created out of an individual's relationship with the world - that information retains some connection with its author that allows that person some control over how it is replicated and used.

In other words, the claim that lies beneath the notion of intellectual property is similar or identical to the one that underpins notions of privacy. It seems to me that the two are inseparable, because they are fundamentally aspects of the same issue, the need we have to be able to do something by convention that is impossible by force: the need to ringfence certain information. I believe that the most important unexamined notion - for policymakers and agitators both - in these debates is that they are one: you can't persuade people on the one hand to abandon intellectual property (a decision which, incidentally, would mean an even more massive upheaval in the way the world runs than we've seen so far since 1990) and hope to keep them interested in privacy. You can't trash privacy and hope to retain a sense of respect for IP.”

― Nick Harkaway, The Blind Giant

INTRODUCTION

One of the main legal bases of the Philippine IP System is the Constitution because it includes the protection of property, which is safeguarded under the law. It provides that “no person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.. xxx”[i] If we recall, there are two (2) classifications of property,[ii] namely, immovable or real property, and movable or personal property. Further classifications would include tangible and intangible as to susceptibility to touch. For “tangible, it is an asset that has a physical existence and is capable of being assigned a value whereas intangible is something that lacks a physical form; an abstraction, such as responsibility; esp., an asset that is not corporeal, such as intellectual property.”[iii] Rights are also property and would include intellectual property rights because we can touch and see the inventions.

Each country has its own protection for the inventors to keep their property as a result of their creative minds. Furthermore, “the importance of intellectual property was first recognized in the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property (1883) and the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works (1886). Both treaties are administered by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO).[iv] Intellectual property rights are “the rights given to persons over the creations of their minds. They usually give the creator an exclusive right over the use of his/her creation for a certain period of time.”[v] In this regard, it would encourage the authors, owners and creators of the works to produce more innovations and ideas that can be protected and obtain exclusive rights when they have decided to disclose their inventions and put in the market. The Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) are inline with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which provides that “xxx (2) everyone has the right to the protection of the moral and material interests resulting from any scientific, literary or artistic production of which he is the author.”[vi]

EVOLVING MARKETS IN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY (IP)

Intellectual Property such as patents, copyrights, trademarks and trade secrets play an important role in the international economic development nowadays. It does not only contribute to our marketplaces, but also to promote advancement in establishing the value and potential growth of the new products and innovations as well as to secure the works or inventions of the creators, authors, or owners of the works from imitating, copying, using, manufacturing or selling that would result to infringement. Intellectual Property has been defined as “the term used to describe intangible assets resulting from the creative work of an individual or organization. IP also refers to creations of the mind, such as inventions, literary and artistic works, and symbols, names, images and designs used in commerce.”[vii] The ideas, processes, improvements and discoveries that come from a persons mind are also part of intellectual property. These assets are protected under the law, which gives the owners, creators and authors an exclusive right over their innovations. Aside from encouraging individuals to create more invention, it can also be used as an investment by providing them a financial incentive and a royalty from the works they have done.

There are four (4) key forms of Intellectual property, which include patents, copyrights, trademarks and trade secrets. “Trademark means any visible sign capable of distinguishing the goods or services of an enterprise and shall include a stamped or marked container of goods.”[viii] On the other hand, “Patentable Inventions is any technical solution of a problem in any field of human activity which is new, involves an inventive step and is industrially applicable shall be patentable. It may be, or may relate to, a product, or process, or an improvement of any of the foregoing.”[ix] While “Copyright is confined to literary and artistic works, hereinafter referred to as works, are original intellectual creations in the literary and artistic domain protected from the moment of their creation.”[x] Whereas “Trade secret law is a branch of intellectual property law that is concerned with the protection of proprietary information against unauthorized commercial use by others.”[xi] However, “trade secrets are not currently recognised by all IPR systems in the ASEAN region, but there are practical steps your business can take to keep your crucial information secret.”[xii] Amongst these forms, patent is the most important intellectual property because of its technicality.

Additionally, in running a business, an individual must be aware of his own as well as other’s intellectual property rights because as we can see, these multinational companies have been combatting over their respective intellectual property rights. Besides, this has gained commercially in the past few years since enticements from each individual are enormously increasing. Therefore, these corporate societies must implement voluminous experimental approaches in order to protect their intellectual property rights. For this reason, it will come up for the purpose of intellectual property laws which specifies that“[xiii] to strengthen intellectual and industrial property system in the Philippines as mandated by the country’s accession to the Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization (WTO).”

The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) is composed of ten countries, which includes Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam. “The ASEAN Working Group on Intellectual Property Cooperation (AWGIPC) is the sectoral group responsible for IP issues in the region. It is composed of the IP offices of the ASEAN Member States. The work of the AWGIPC is based on the ASEAN IPR Action Plan 2011-2015.”[xiv] Correspondingly, the ASEAN has just formally launched an intellectual property (IP) portal that will perform as a core for ASEAN on IP – related issues. It provides:
“The ASEAN IP Portal (www.aseanip.org) was launched today, in conjunction with World IP Day. Comprising information on ASEAN IP systems, comparative IP-related data, and web links to ASEAN IP Offices, stakeholders of ASEAN Member States can now obtain IP information for the entire ASEAN region via a consolidated platform. This one-stop portal facilitates information flow within the region's IP knowledge network and enables stakeholders to access relevant information such as notices and procedures on the ASEAN Patent Examination Co-operation (ASPEC) – a new work sharing initiative for patent search and examination in ASEAN, in a more efficient manner. The increased accessibility to information will help strengthen IP systems of ASEAN Member States and raise the level of IP awareness in the region.”
“The lack of physical parameters by which most of these assets can be defined or identified does not preclude the recognition of their innate value and the need to protect them from theft or unauthorized use, just like tangible assets. This is the primary reason for the establishment of IP Offices throughout the world.”[xv]
  
Registration is one of the most important things to accomplish in order to protect the inventor’s asset. Otherwise, his invention can steal by another person and have it registered in his name. In this sense, he will be prejudiced by the invention he have studied and worked hard in a long time without benefiting from it. But if anyone would like to report an identical innovation, his works have already been safeguarded in his local territory thus this would prevent his works from counterfeiting, piracy and infringement. On the other hand, the creators, owners or authors must first register his invention to the country of his origin before securing another registration to foreign countries.

Previously, patent application requires an extensive procedure to determine whether it has been granted or not. For example, what if the inventor wants to apply his invention in several countries? How can it be protected? Thus, he has three (3) choices:

“1. You can file separate patent applications at the same time in all of the countries in which you would like to protect your invention (for some countries, regional patents may be available);
2. You can file a patent application in a Paris Convention country (one of the Member States of the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property), and then file separate patent applications in other Paris Convention countries within twelve (12) months from the filing date of that first patent application, giving you the benefit in all those countries of the filing date of the first application; and
3. You can file an application under the PCT, which is simpler, easier and more cost-effective than either (a) or (b).”[xvi]

In the above-mentioned options, Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) is the most efficient way in filing for an international patent application since it has been simultaneously recognized in different countries where you envisioned applying. Patent Cooperative Treaty (PCT), which “assists applicants in seeking patent protection internationally for their inventions, helps patent Offices with their patent granting decisions, and facilitates public access to a wealth of technical information relating to those inventions.  By filing one international patent application under the PCT, applicants can simultaneously seek protection for an invention in 148 countries throughout the world”[xvii] and is also managed by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO).
                  
In filing for an application, if an inventor has filed the priority application to his local territory, he has to wait for another one (1) year before he can file for a PCT application in another country. This is not a guarantee that he could attain his international patent protection. Instead, it is commended that the creators, owners or authors of the works must register his inventions in the country of his origin before applying to the country where he intended to have his patent protected before entering the market. This involves filing a separate application at the national stage, which would occur in thirty (30) or thirty one (31) months after the filing of the priority application date. In this phase, he has to think whether to continue his application. Why? Because the application for each country does not only take a long process, but it would also require huge amount of money, as he has in need to engage an IP lawyer in each country to aid him with his application. In this case, the inventor will be having second thoughts on whether to continue with the application or stick to his country of origin. Similarly, the inventor must adhere to the rules and regulations mandated by the treaties since every country has its own patent law.

For instance, A, invented an electric wheelbarrow, after registering to his local territory (Philippines), he decided to apply his patented invention in other countries such as Singapore, United States of America, Malaysia, Korea and Indonesia. Therefore, he has to apply in each country and wait for his patent application to be granted. However, there are certain countries, which do not examine the inventor’s application that would make it reasonably fast. But then again, there are also countries that have a strict implementation. Hence, the officers-in-charge or the committees have to scrutinize the documents and examine his application on whether the subject of the patent application is useful, novel and not obvious. This is one of the disadvantages in filing to foreign countries because ASEAN members are sometimes being discriminated that would result to slow emerging new products and technologies.

CONCLUSION

With the ASEAN Intellectual Property Rights Action Plan, 2011 – 2015 will be of great advantage not only to the multinational companies here in the Philippines, but also more importantly to the Filipino owners, creators and authors in pertaining to their inventions as it would be less burdens, since they only have to file one application to ASEAN region. Nonetheless, “some ASEAN countries, which require a three-step process to legalize documents: Notarization; Certification by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs; and Certification by the consulate office of the respective ASEAN country.”[xviii]  This, however, would only be necessary if it is a prerequisite in selected countries.

This was articulated in an IPR Action Plan “to help accelerate the pace and scope of IP asset creation, commercialization and protection; to improve the regional framework of policies and institutions relating to IP and IPRs, including the development and harmonization of enabling IPR registration systems; to promote IP cooperation and dialogues within the region as well with the region’s Dialogue Partners and organizations; to strengthen IP-related human and institutional capabilities in the region, including fostering greater public awareness of issues and implications, relating to IP and IPRs.”[xix]
                                                  
Furthermore, it must be pushed in the coming years so that new skills must be completely recognized internationally. The Philippines must attain to the standards of the other nations in order for the Filipino inventors to be recognized not only in our local territory but as well as in other countries. While they reaped from their creative and intellectual labors, they should be given exclusive rights for the inventions they have made. Moreover, they must continue to expand their knowledge on how to make it new so that it may become successful in the future. Accordingly, these innovations must have a positive reputation that would cultivate an impact to other citizens and make it as their investments. Besides, ASEAN countries must adhere to the goals they have created, as it would have been a competitive advantage to different categories of industries and in order to fully implement the IP System globally.

To achieve the 2015 goal of economic integration, the AWGIPC will build on past accomplishments, intensify the level of cooperation among AMSs by building on each other’s strengths, and continue partnering with organizations and institutions in order to move forward collectively towards a single direction, albeit at varying paces.”[xx]

Thus, without intellectual property, the creators, owners or authors of the works maybe contemplated as a common property. Therefore, it would be disregarded as it is not protected and may not be acknowledged which eventually can suffer lost, as they cannot be fully compensated. Thus, the query on how Intellectual Property affects the Association of Southeast Asian Nation, also known as ASEAN, would be contingent mostly on economic development of every nation. Nevertheless, it can either play a progressive function in strengthening the creation and acquisition of the invention or may cause damage by allowing the owners to monopolize it.













[i] Philippine Constitution, Article III, Section 1.
[ii] The Civil Code of the Philippines, Book II, Article 414.
[iii] BRYAN A. GARNER, Black’s Law Dictionary, pp. 135 and 879, 9th ed.
[iv] World Trade Organization, What are Intellectual Property Rights?, available at http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/trips_e/intel1_e.htm, last accessed May 26, 2014.
[v] Ibid.
[vi] The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 27 available at http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/index.shtml#a27, last accessed May 26, 2014.
[vii] Republic Act No. 10055, Sec. 4 (2010).
[viii] Republic Act No. 8293, Part III, Section 121.1.
[ix] Republic Act No. 8293, Part II, Section 21.
[x] Republic Act No. 8293, Part IV, Section 172.1.
[xi]Sally Kane, Trade Secret Law, available at http://legalcareers.about.com/od/legalspecialties/a/tradesecretlaw.htm, May 26, 2014.
[xii] ASEAN Briefing, Intellectual Property Rights Strategies in Southeast Asia: Know Before You Go, available at http://www.aseanbriefing.com/news/2014/02/18/intellectual-property-rights-strategies-southeast-asia-know-go.html, last accessed May 28, 2014.
[xiii] Mirpuri v. CA, GR No. 114508, November 19, 1999.
[xiv] ASEAN Intellectual Property Portal, About AWGIPC, available at http://www.aseanip.org/ipportal/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=80&Itemid=294, last accessed May 28, 2014
[xv] ASEAN Intellectual Property Rights Action Plan 2011 – 2015, available at http://www.ecap-project.org/sites/default/files/IP_resources/ASEAN%20IPR%20Action%20Plan%202011-2015.pdf, last accessed May 28, 2014
[xvi] World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), Protecting Your Inventions Abroad: Frequently Asked Questions About the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), available at http://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/pct/en/basic_facts/faqs_about_the_pct.pdf, last accessed May 28, 2014.
[xvii] World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), PCT – The International Patent System, available at http://www.wipo.int/pct/en/, last accessed May 28, 2014.
[xviii] EY, Trade Secrets ASEAN Economic Community and Inward Investment, available at http://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/Trade_Secrets:_ASEAN_economic_community_and_inward_investment/$FILE/EY-trade-secrets.pdf, last accessed May 28, 2014
[xix]ASEAN Action Plan, 2011 – 2015, available at http://www.ecap-project.org/sites/default/files/IP_resources/ASEAN%20IPR%20Action%20Plan%202011-2015.pdf, last accessed May 28, 2014.
[xx] Ibid.

Thursday, May 8, 2014

Situational Gray Areas of RA 10173 (Data Privacy Act)



“They who can give up liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.”
-          Benjamin Franklin

Introduction

Nowadays, technology is starting to rule the world. As the new emerging technological devices, these have influenced our interaction with other individuals. Through this technology, it changes the lives of so many people by making our lives much easier and faster. Also, not only it is beneficial to the society, but to the business companies as well. Apparently, this technology has a negative and positive effect on us.

Over the last five years, technology has been rapidly changing and expanding in every field imaginable. Smart phones are now capable of acting as standalone computer devices that can take pictures, search the Internet, send emails and text messages and yes, they even make phone calls. While it might seem that the technology of today has reached its limits, it is still actually spreading its proverbial wings. Only twenty or so years ago, personal computers were becoming small enough and affordable enough for families to buy them for home use. Since then, the world of technology has shown no signs of slowing down and practically every device available today is somehow tied to computer technology.[i]

Privacy

Privacy is classified into two: General and Specific. In general, the right to be free from secret surveillance and to determine whether, when, how, and to whom, one's personal or organizational information is to be revealed. In specific, privacy may be divided into four categories (1) Physical: restriction on others to experience a person or situation through one or more of the human senses; (2) Informational: restriction on searching for or revealing facts that are unknown or unknowable to others; (3) Decisional: restriction on interfering in decisions that are exclusive to an entity; (4) Dispositional: restriction on attempts to know an individual's state of mind.[ii]
When the government gathers or analyzes personal information, many people say they're not worried. "I've got nothing to hide," they declare. "Only if you're doing something wrong should you worry, and then you don't deserve to keep it private." The nothing-to-hide argument pervades discussions about privacy. The data-security expert Bruce Schneier calls it the "most common retort against privacy advocates." The legal scholar Geoffrey Stone refers to it as an "all-too-common refrain." In its most compelling form, it is an argument that the privacy interest is generally minimal, thus making the contest with security concerns a foreordained victory for security.[iii]
Right to Privacy under the 1987 Constitution
The Republic of the Philippines, through several statutes and the 1987 Constitution constitutes the Right of Privacy. To wit:
Section 1.  No person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law, nor shall any person be denied equal protection of the laws;

Section. 2. The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses papers, and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures of whatever nature and for any purpose shall be inviolable, and no search warrant or warrant of arrest shall issue except upon probable cause to be determined personally by the judge after examination under oath or affirmation of the complainant and the witnesses he may produce, and particularly describing the place to be searched and the persons or things to be seized.
Section 3. (1) The privacy of communication and correspondence shall be inviolable except upon lawful order of the court, or when public safety or order requires otherwise, as prescribed by law.
(2) Any evidence obtained in violation of this or the preceding section shall be inadmissible for any purpose in any proceeding.[iv]
Data Privacy Act (RA 10173)
Thus, it protects a person’s right to privacy. Nevertheless, it only pertains with the protection of personal information in general. Considering the things that our happening in our country, the government created a new law that recognize the very first data privacy law, the Republic Act No. 10173, also known as An Act Protecting Individual Personal Information in Information and Communications Systems in the Government and the Private Sector, creating for this purpose a National Privacy Commission, And For Other Purposes.[v] It is envisioned to safeguard the veracity and wellbeing of personal data in public and private sectors. President Benigno Aquino, Jr. signed this on August 15, 2012 and was published on August 24, 2012. It took effect fifteen (15) days after its publication, on September 8, 2012.
The enactment of the law seeks to bring the Philippines’ data protection policies and measures on par with the international standards of data privacy protection. Government and business leaders also believe that the implementation of the law will help maintain the competitiveness of the Philippines to boos investments in its information technology-business process outsourcing sector and support a healthy information and communications technology (ICT) industry.[vi] Data Privacy Act was created in line with the rapid economic growth of Information Technology and Business Process Outsourcing or also known as the IP – BPO Industry since it has a huge impact in the Philippine government as one of the leading business. Furthermore, it would also be advantageous to them as they are providing the security of personal information of their international clients.
Personal Information refers to any information whether recorded in a material form or not, from which the identity of an individual is apparent or can be reasonably and directly ascertained by the entity holding the information, or when put together with other information would directly and certainly identify an individual.[vii] The Data Privacy Act classifies certain personal information as sensitive personal information. Sensitive personal information refers to personal information:

(1) About an individual’s race, ethnic origin, marital status, age, color, and religious, philosophical or political affiliations;
(2) About an individual’s health, education, genetic or sexual life of a person, or to any proceeding for any offense committed or alleged to have been committed by such person, the disposal of such proceedings, or the sentence of any court in such proceedings;
(3) Issued by government agencies peculiar to an individual which includes, but not limited to, social security numbers, previous or cm-rent health records, licenses or its denials, suspension or revocation, and tax returns; and
(4) Specifically established by an executive order or an act of Congress to be kept classified.
The Data Privacy Act also refers to privileged information, which covers any and all forms of data, which, under the Philippine Rules of Court and other pertinent laws, constitute privileged communication.

Generally, processing of information is allowed where there is consent:
     Personal information – The data subject has given his or her consent.
     Sensitive personal information – The data subject has given his or her consent specific to the purpose prior to the processing.
Privileged information – All parties to the exchange have given their consent prior to processing.[viii]
However, the personal information of an individual must remain confidential because clients would entrust all the necessary requirements provided to their companies as a mandate. What if for instance, one of the employees was negligent in giving the personal information to another? What would happen to the person who was being defrauded?  Therefore, it can be accessed easily and can be used to threaten the other.  The penalties imposed to those who will violate this law are as follows:
SEC. 26. Accessing Personal Information and Sensitive Personal Information Due to Negligence. – (a) Accessing personal information due to negligence shall be penalized by imprisonment ranging from one (1) year to three (3) years and a fine of not less than Five hundred thousand pesos (Php500,000.00) but not more than Two million pesos (Php2,000,000.00) shall be imposed on persons who, due to negligence, provided access to personal information without being authorized under this Act or any existing law.
(b) Accessing sensitive personal information due to negligence shall be penalized by imprisonment ranging from three (3) years to six (6) years and a fine of not less than Five hundred thousand pesos (Php500,000.00) but not more than Four million pesos (Php4,000,000.00) shall be imposed on persons who, due to negligence, provided access to personal information without being authorized under this Act or any existing law.
SEC. 32. Unauthorized Disclosure. – (a) Any personal information controller or personal information processor or any of its officials, employees or agents, who discloses to a third party personal information not covered by the immediately preceding section without the consent of the data subject, shall he subject to imprisonment ranging from one (1) year to three (3) years and a fine of not less than Five hundred thousand pesos (Php500,000.00) but not more than One million pesos (Php1,000,000.00).
(b) Any personal information controller or personal information processor or any of its officials, employees or agents, who discloses to a third party sensitive personal information not covered by the immediately preceding section without the consent of the data subject, shall be subject to imprisonment ranging from three (3) years to five (5) years and a fine of not less than Five hundred thousand pesos (Php500,000.00) but not more than Two million pesos (Php2,000,000.00).Nonetheless, these
These penalties are in huge amount. However, the amount is not significant if it would imperil the life of an individual in which the personal information has been divulged due to the negligence of one of the employees of the company.
The Canadian privacy expert David Flaherty expresses a similar idea when he argues: "There is no sentient human being in the Western world who has little or no regard for his or her personal privacy; those who would attempt such claims cannot withstand even a few minutes' questioning about intimate aspects of their lives without capitulating to the intrusiveness of certain subject matters."

But such responses attack the nothing-to-hide argument only in its most extreme form, which isn't particularly strong. In a less extreme form, the nothing-to-hide argument refers not to all personal information but only to the type of data the government is likely to collect. Retorts to the nothing-to-hide argument about exposing people's naked bodies or their deepest secrets are relevant only if the government is likely to gather this kind of information. In many instances, hardly anyone will see the information, and it won't be disclosed to the public. Thus, some might argue, the privacy interest is minimal, and the security interest in preventing terrorism is much more important. In this less extreme form, the nothing-to-hide argument is a formidable one. However, it stems from certain faulty assumptions about privacy and its value.

To evaluate the nothing-to-hide argument, we should begin by looking at how its adherents understand privacy. Nearly every law or policy involving privacy depends upon a particular understanding of what privacy is. The way problems are conceived has a tremendous impact on the legal and policy solutions used to solve them. As the philosopher John Dewey observed, "A problem well put is half-solved."[ix]
Conclusion
Privacy is rarely lost in one fell swoop. It is usually eroded over time; little bits dissolving almost imperceptibly until we finally begin to notice how much is gone.

"My life's an open book," people might say. "I've got nothing to hide." But now the government has large dossiers of everyone's activities, interests, reading habits, finances, and health. What if the government leaks the information to the public? What if the government mistakenly determines that based on your pattern of activities, you're likely to engage in a criminal act? What if it denies you the right to fly? What if the government thinks your financial transactions look odd—even if you've done nothing wrong—and freezes your accounts? What if the government doesn't protect your information with adequate security, and an identity thief obtains it and uses it to defraud you? Even if you have nothing to hide, the government can cause you a lot of harm.

"But the government doesn't want to hurt me," some might argue. In many cases, that's true, but the government can also harm people inadvertently, due to errors or carelessness.[x]
With the fast-paced advances in information technology, RA 10173 will hopefully serve as a deterrent to data breaches arising from malicious actions. Moreover, it must serve as a constant reminder to personal information handlers that, where personal information is concerned, there should be no room for any kind of error – intentional or otherwise. Every mistake should be treated as one that may pose a serious harm to affected individuals.[xi]

The newly enacted law should still be improved because of the salient provisions, which duly affect the some of the pertinent laws under the 1987 Constitution. Thus, the confidentiality of each and every one of us must be scrutinized. It maybe favorable to some of us such as the Information Technology and Business Process Outsourcing or also known as the IP – BPO Industry to augment the investment in our country, nevertheless it maybe detrimental to others particularly to those who are not aware on how does technology work.





[i] HOW TECHNOLOGY HAS CHANGED OUR LIVES IN THE LAST FIVE YEARS, http://www.centertech.org
[iii] Solove, Daniel J. May 15, 2011. Citing Websites. The Chronicles Review: Why Privacy Matters Even if You Have 'Nothing to Hide'. http://chronicle.com/article/Why-Privacy-Matters-Even-if/127461/
[iv] Section 3, Article III of the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines
[vi] Rosell, Laxmi and Tomarong-CaƱabano, Sheilah Marie. Analysis: The Philippines. Data Privacy Act Of 2012
[vii] Section 3 (g), Republic Act 10173
[viii] Miguel, Marianne M., Recent Development in Law and Jurisprudence. http://www.iflr1000.com/LegislationGuide/967/Recent-developments-in-law-and-jurisprudence.html
[ix] Solove, Daniel J. May 15, 2011. Citing Websites. The Chronicles Review: Why Privacy Matters Even if You Have 'Nothing to Hide'. http://chronicle.com/article/Why-Privacy-Matters-Even-if/127461/
[x] Ibid
[xi] Dimarucut, Carlo Kristle G., The protection of personal information